|
SEMINAR EVALUATION
Presenter's Name: Mary C. Berkerle_____________________
Title of Presentation: Adhesion Signaling and Cancer
Date: July 2007____________
|
Categories of Evaluation: Maximum of 10-points
[%] for each category. |
I. Content: Completeness,
creativity, and effectiveness.
|
1. Title, Author, & Address [Biol. Dept., Tenn. Tech. Univ.,Cookeville,
TN. zip] |
10 |
|
2. Introduction [Literature references/cited?] |
10 |
|
3. Objective/Hypothesis [Null?] Statements [Clearly stated?] |
10 |
|
4. Methods & Materials [Literature reference to methods used; Statistics/cited?] |
10 |
|
5. Results & Discussion [Results agree/disagree with literature/cited? Tables/Figures?] |
10 |
|
6. Conclusions [Is take-home-message clear? Was Null Hypothesis Rejected?] |
10 |
I I. Style:
|
7. Visual Aids [Colors/contrast; images/pics of research set-up?] |
10 |
|
8. Organization of Material [Includes recommended slides/sections?] |
10 |
|
9. Clarity of Presentations [Eye contact; has it been practiced?] |
10 |
|
10. Professionalism [Mannerism, dress, confidence?] |
10 |
|
TOTAL |
100 |
Note: Null Hypothesis rejected;
alternative Hypothesis accepted? Yes_________
Evaluator: Rachel Whittle______________________________
SEMINAR EVALUATION
Presenter's Name: Martin Raff______________________________
Title of Presentation: Growth Control in Animal Development
Date: November 2006_________
|
Categories of Evaluation: Maximum of 10-points
[%] for each category. |
I. Content: Completeness, creativity, and
effectiveness.
|
1. Title, Author, & Address [Biol. Dept., Tenn. Tech. Univ.,Cookeville, TN. zip] |
10 |
|
2. Introduction [Literature references/cited?] |
10 |
|
3. Objective/Hypothesis [Null?] Statements [Clearly stated?] |
10 |
|
4. Methods & Materials [Literature reference to methods used; Statistics/cited?] |
10 |
|
5. Results & Discussion [Results agree/disagree with literature/cited? Tables/Figures?] |
10 |
|
6. Conclusions [Is take-home-message clear? Was Null Hypothesis Rejected?] |
10 |
I I. Style:
|
7. Visual Aids [Colors/contrast; images/pics of research set-up?] |
10 |
|
8. Organization of Material [Includes recommended slides/sections?] |
10 |
|
9. Clarity of Presentations [Eye contact; has it been practiced?] |
10 |
|
10. Professionalism [Mannerism, dress, confidence?] |
10 |
|
TOTAL |
100 |
Note: Null Hypothesis rejected;
alternative Hypothesis accepted? yes_______________
Evaluator: Rachel Whittle_________________________________
|